« Learning from Innovators in Action | Main | In Case You Missed It »

September 29, 2008

Comments

I believe some riders wear helmets to make a statement rather than for protection. In Colorado helmets are optional. I see a lot of riders on the interstate with no helmet or any other kind of protection.

On a related subject, I would like to get a response on the issue of dual sport motorcylces. These motorcyles are arguably the safest motorcycles on the road. They are lite, maneuverable and can handle almost any terrain or obstacle. However, states like Kansas will not allow many of the dual sport motorcycles on the road, because the original MSO was for off-road. If a person can put a lighting kit on the bike and meet all the federal requirements, why can't these bikes be put on the road? The head of the Kansas DMV does not allow them because he is afraid of losing his federal highway dollars. Yet all the states around Kansas allow these motorcyles and benefit from the revenue, but not one of them has ever lost their federal dollars because they put them on the road. This also has been going on the better part of 30 years. Could a memo be put out from your office that allows these motorcylces on the road (with some kind of guidance)even though they do not have the federal safety tag (put out through the national highway transportation administration?) One way to get these bikes on the road, according to the head of the Kansas DMV, is to take the bike to a "federally certified modifier", of which non exist to my knowledge. This modifier is supposedly someone who can perform the mods and generate a federal plate/tag for the bike. How does one become one of these federally certified modifiers? Dualsporting is gaining a huge following in the past few years. It gives individuals a chance to see the US through the "back roads" and trails. Yet in a quest for more safety in handling some of the more technical trails the riders are searching for bikes that weigh as little as possible. Those that are made currently like the KLR 650 and DRZ 400 are heavy and cummbersome. So riders are putting lighting kits on bikes like the KTM 400exc and WR450's and trying to get them taged for the road. We have found ways to allow a model A or model T on the road and call it safe, but somehow these bikes are labeled as "not safe" just because they did not originally go through the process of getting the federal safety tag put on. Surely there is something that can be done. Think of the fuel saved. Think of the reduced emissions due to more and more of these bikes being put on the road.

I cannot believe how many people do not follow the helmet laws and get away with it. A head wrap is not a helmet!

http://www.headwrap.us

One of the biggest problems we seem to see in the UK are children riding Quad Bikes and ATVs on the streets - with no insurance, helmets and some not even old enough to ride.

I think every government should make the suppliers of Quad Bikes, ATVs, Buggies and Mini Moto's make each person sign a declaration that states they know that it is unsafe to ride without the correct safety training and equipment.

Then, we would hear less excuses when they get brought before the courts for breaking the laws and riding these machines. hd film izle

I cannot believe how many people do not follow the helmet laws and get away with it. A head wrap is not a helmet!

I cannot believe how many people do not follow the helmet laws and get away with it. A head wrap is not a helmet!

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe

  • E-mail updates
    E-mail updates
  • RSS feed
    RSS feed
Add to Technorati Favorites