« State DOTs on Recovery Act success to date: "The facts speak for themselves" | Main | At Senate lunch, talk of DOT role in climate and energy »

July 21, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e551eea4f588340115712b3cf9970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Thank you, Sarasota and Rep. Buchanan:

Comments

Dear Secretary LaHood,

I was the fellow who asked you the question at the Town Hall meeting at the Sarasota/Manatee Airport, about the bicycle/pedestrian question. My question concerned a problem of state and local concern. Florida has been the nation’s leader in bicycle/pedestrian fatalities for over 30 years. From 2001 to 2007, the only years that I have checked, Florida was either #1 or in the top three in bicycle and pedestrian fatalities. No other state comes close to Florida in this tragic statistic.

Sarasota and Manatee Counties are among the worst of the worst. In the latest five year rolling average of bicycle fatalities and injuries from FDOT, Sarasota County is #4 and Manatee County is #3.

My question to you was if you could correct a longstanding historical inequity which is contributing to this problem. In 2007, bicycle and pedestrian fatalities were 13% of overall traffic fatalities, according to NHTSA. Yet, USDOT safety funding, through the 402 and Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) were less than 1% for bike/ped safety.

When I asked you if you could administratively correct this problem, you referred me to Congressman Buchanan. I am following up with him. However, I still wonder if the Secretary of USDOT can influence how these funds are spent. Is this the sole prerogative of Congress? Or, can you place some administrative requirements on the funding?

Preliminary findings suggest that the states themselves have broad discretion in how these funds are spent. Can USDOT actively encourage the states to increase their funding for bike/ped safety?

Preliminary findings also suggest that only 52% of HSIP funds are spent by the states anyway. Thus, a lack of funds is not the issue. Can USDOT encourage the states to use the unspent funds on bike/ped safety.

These are three administrative avenues to explore. Should the congressional avenue still appear to be the best one, it would be great if USDOT would use its influence to encourage the Congress to insert the following language into 23 USC Section 148:

(h) FUNDS FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY- A State shall allocate for bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements in the State a percentage of the funds remaining after implementation of sections 130(e), in an amount that is equal to or greater than the percentage of all fatal crashes in the States involving bicyclists and pedestrians.

Thank you, Secretary LaHood, for coming to Sarasota and responding to my question. And, thank you for reading and responding to this.

Mike Lasche
Bicycle/Pedestrian Advocates

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe

  • E-mail updates
    E-mail updates
  • RSS feed
    RSS feed
Add to Technorati Favorites