« Recovery Act creating transportation jobs; June data indicates progress | Main | CARS: This program has worked, but it's winding down »

August 19, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e551eea4f588340120a55b6b38970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference NHTSA, MADD unveil 6th annual pre-Labor Day "Over the Limit. Under Arrest." enforcement campaign:

Comments

Drinking and driving around the holidays is always a major problem. But with 40% of traffic fatalities last Labor Day caused by drunk drivers, it sounds like an out of control problem in parts of the country. I think California has one of the taughest drunk driving laws in the country. And that combined with a good outreach program and alternative transportation provided to drunk drivers during holiday periods so they don't drive has really had a positive impact here. It is not the law alone that has an impact. It is also the outreach about it and the transpohrtation alternatives all together that has created the positive result. But every year some people sttill ignore all of this and still drink, drive and have accidents so real good, vigilant law enforcement is also critical. Best wishes, Michael E. Bailey.

Dear Secretary LaHood,
Thanks for the words on DWI; we should get to common European limit of 0.05%, since well done research yrs ago shows impairment of ability begins at 0.04%.
On separate issue, is there a way to pass a law that ALL cell phones be GPS equipped? My idea is that, as with GPS systems such as Garmin Nuvi, the device can list your real-time car speed...so here's the wrinkle: phone mfrs would be required to make the phones disable TEXTING if the GPS-in-phone 'brain' detected the car going faster than, say, 5 mph.
Driver and passengers would be blocked from sending OR receiving texts UNTIL stopped...I was nearly deleted by a woman texting as she zoomed past me in her Hummer at 55 mph. Good luck on this one...maybe a similar block could be put in for phonecalls...I'm sure you're well familiar with the great New Engl Jrnl Med article on cell phone usage, and how no method (hands free, etc) prevents the dwi-like distraction for the driving task at hand.
Thanks
Dan R. Olson, MD (pathologist, ret'd)
PS a bonus idea of mine (?1980) (promo/bumper sticker):
"You'll only need your seatbelt once...GUESS when."
PSS--are you related to Tom Lahood of Omaha (Union Pac PR man, ret'd)?...know you're not on the family tree of the dastardly (Richard Dysart-ly) Coy LaHood in Eastwood's "Pale Rider".

The most efficient way to deal with Drinking & Driving is simple:
Separate the two activities by providing PUBLIC TRANSPORT.
Had one drink too many?---Take transit or a taxi if a designated driver is unavailable.
PUBLIC TRANSPORT needs the backing of Lawyers, Lawmakers, Prosecutors, Judges, Local Police and State Police Departments, County Sheriffs and local, county, state and US Courts & Criminal Justice System instead of the current approach of costly legal, court and sentencing game utilized as punishment for drinking & driving.
The present system is geared as a lucrative profit centre, is hypocritical, very-very costly in human lives and a total failure.
SAVE LIVES:
SEPARATE DRINKING & DRIVING WITH PUBLIC TRANSPORT.

I have heard the expression, I guess on radio or television before, though it stuck with me more when I had seen it several times on an interstate display sign while driving on I-65 in Western Kentucky this past week.

Though I did not recognize what it meant, seeing it on here it stands out and makes one realize (at least to me) that the large displays over the interstate displaying the message gets one to take notice; I would presume that sends a message that the police are out there looking and hopefully that gets the message across not to drink and drive.

I was there, it was a great speech, and he is right, tougher punishments for all rulebreakers, it just makes sense!

I think strong laws and punishments are definitely justified for drink driving incidents. It is such a stupid crime to commit and so easily avoided!

The problem with drunk drivers is that they feel if they are caught, they will simply get a slap on the wrist. There should be toughter rules imposed to make it more difficult to avoid a driving ban.

I understand the dangers of driving under the influence and have lost friends due to drinking and driving... The thing is... People keep drinking and driving.

I agree with Daniel Olsen that we need to offer alternatives for people... Free shuttle services, extended public transportation services, etc.

My idea is that, as with GPS systems such as Garmin Nuvi, the device can list your real-time car speed...so here's the wrinkle: phone mfrs would be required to make the phones disable TEXTING if the GPS-in-phone 'brain' detected the car going faster than, say, 5 mph.

I agree with the earlier comments that there should be tougher penalties for this sort of offense. In the US you can be caught more than once before you are banned. In the UK, it is an immediate 12 month ban.

I think this proves that the US is still someway behind the UK in terms of the penalties for drink driving. I think this is partly due to Americans being more reliant on cars compared with other forms of transport.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe

  • E-mail updates
    E-mail updates
  • RSS feed
    RSS feed
Add to Technorati Favorites