« Recovery Act transportation investments: good for New Hampshire, good for America | Main | Federal Highway Administration passes Recovery Act milestone: $20 billion obligated »

November 03, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e551eea4f588340120a6a3c96e970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference DOT ready to talk about future of rail:

Comments

With all due respect, Mr. Secretary, all we have had since DOT was created was talk about the future of rail. Now, we have a "preliminary" rail plan. It is time for results; you should be driving your department to go beyond talk of rail.

The railroads are the most fuel efficient form of transporation we have and getting more fuel efficient and cleaner operating all the time. CalEPA is working with the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles and Burlington Northern-Santa Fe and Union Pacific Railroads on an idea for a maglev freight railroad to move containers from the ports docks to the near-dock rail terminals. They are also looking at electrification of all rail lines in the Los Angeles Basin. Burlington Northern-Santa Fe now has an all hydrogen powered locomotive working in its Los Angeles Train Yards. Best wishes, Michael E. Bailey.

YES, we need this!

The best prescription for congestion relief and a safer and more sustainable transportation future in urban areas: Create or expand passenger rail, use pricing strategies on *all* existing urban highway lanes to encourage mode shift, and use the tolls to support both highway and rail operations. Finally, change federal transportation policy such that transit is favored over highways. We need people to choose to get our of their cars, not more lanes to make it more convenient for relatively short periods of time, i.e., until the next highway expansion is necessary due to degraged performance of new lanes.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe

  • E-mail updates
    E-mail updates
  • RSS feed
    RSS feed
Add to Technorati Favorites