« Welcome aboard, NHTSA Administrator David Strickland | Main | The President’s Cabinet: Reporting to You--video project shares a year of progress »

January 26, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e551eea4f5883401287711f7de970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New distracted driving restrictions on commercial truck and bus drivers:

Comments

I applaud this move. The only thing I think is bizarre? This should be made a law for ALL drivers, not just commercial drivers. And how about the same fine? $2750...? WOW! I don't even think the DUI fine is that much! My husband drives a truck, he is an owner operator and is the main bread winner after I became disabled. That amount is more than 2 months of mortgage payments. Does our government want Americans to loose our homes? How about when he and all the other drivers have to sell their trucks because of the ridiculous fines put on them? How will you get your groceries, gas for your car, parts to fix your car and roads to drive on? I think ALL drivers should have the same penalties, commercial or non-commercial, alike. 1 death is too many, does it really matter the vehicle or bicycle, even?! By the way, my husband does not even know how to text and does not want to learn because he thinks it is dangerous!

If you like safty then look at the cars and pickups using laptops or reading or have there huddy over head and can not see the cell phone is the line in whinch trucks keep in touch with loved ones of course you do not car you are home every night its just more bull SHIT

Ray Brandt
Albany Or.

I agree with the new law banning texting while driving for commercial drivers, but what about non-commercial drivers. What about the driver I saw the other day, steering with her knees and texting with not one hand , BUT BOTH HANDS. Also,I haven't seen anyone bring up the use of laptops while driving, and that would include law enforcement officers also. I drive a big rig myself, and while I have been guilty of texting myself, I do agree it is not the smart thing to do.

Mr.LaHood,
I would REALLY love to talk to you face to face because I have alot that I would like to say about the DOT and commercial vehicles.. My husband is a truck driver and has been for over 25 years, as was my father in law and my father. I am so sick and tired of hearing about when something goes wrong, its the commercial drivers who are at fault. Yes, there are some out there who don't need to be behind the wheel..BUT, they are NOT the only ones at fault Mr LaHood..Yes, I agree with the no texting and cell phone ban 100%, but lets make it for EVERYONE. I would like to know WHY you try to make things harder on commercial drivers? WHY do you always single them out and use them for your examples? Do you not realize that they are the backbone of this country? If it were not for them, the stores would be empty. How do you think the food, clothes, shoes, gas, oil, furniture, etc. gets to the place you buy it from? Just look around, what ever your eyes see, is there because of a "commercial driver", but yet you try your best to make life harder on them.. Why is that Mr LaHood?
I can't tell how many times a day that I see teenagers, grown men and women in CARS, PICKUPS and SUV'S texting and talking on the phone while driving. I have even seen the police and hwy patrol doing it. Do they have to pay the same fines and punishment the commercial drivers have to pay? Just wondering.
If you would like to "respond" to my comments, I would love to hear from you.
Sincerely,
Lauri Brunson

Did this go through congress? How do you have the power to just make law. This is extremely unconstitutional. Your whole organization is unconstitutional. I hope somebody takes you down in supreme court. This whole idea of some dude just making up laws needs to be stopped. Not just for the rediculus texting thing, but all the crazy things they put on people. People who are working hard to make a living and keeping the country moving.

For those of you making comments about the unfairness or shortsightedness of this policy applying only to commercial vehicle drivers and not to all motorists, please remember the structure of our nation's government. The federal government is only allowed by our constitution to implement regulations affecting interstate commerce - therefore the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration exists specifically to regulate "commercial vehicles", including heavy trucks and passenger buses. It is up to the individual 50 states to pass laws governing their motorists, and many states have done so (see http://www.distraction.gov/state-laws/ for a list). Secretary LaHood is doing what he can within his power to make the roads safer. If you feel strongly about this issue, please get in touch with your state legislator or Governor's Highway Safety Office.

Check this out http://www.autoweek.com/article/20100218/FEEDBACK/100219900! AutoWeek Magazine is making a stand against distracted driving.

Concentration during driving is the easiest way to ignore this type of big accidents.

you want to stop distracted driving and i agree it is a problem, but i see not only truckers using the cell phone and texting but i have seen cars and also law enforcement doing the same. I am a trucker and my cell phone is never in use without a hands free device. I was going thru Houston Tx a few days ago and saw a local police officer driving down the road typing on his laptop [WHERE IS THE SAFET IN THAT] you see drivers with laptop stands et up so they can be accesed by the driver and n ot just truckers but driver in all kind of vihicles so yes there is a problem but just targeting trucks is not the total answer

I think that this law is Bull **** It needs to make it so we have freeedom and can do whatever the helll we want because thats why i live in america so i dont have arranged marriages and to make it so i can do anything i want okay so change it please.

The main cause of accidents is alcohol in the blood ...
I think it is necessary to impose restrictions for drivers with the possibility of the contents of a smaller number per mille in the blood. Well, at least for drivers of buses and trucks

I think there are a lot more problems here than just distracted bus/truck drivers. Other vehicles on the road need to start being more cautious of trucks/buses by considering the fact that they cannot stop nearly as fast as other vehicles. It is almost daily on my way to work that I see drivers giving trucks no room which can easily cause an accident.

Any chance you could write an article at some point on car drivers who are aggressive toward truck or bus drivers?

It is really a great decision from government. Now a days there are lots of truck and bus accident taking place due to drivers texting or talking on phone while driving. Those drivers even dont think that if accident takes place many people can die or can seriously get injured or even assest of some poor person can get destroyed.I am glad to here the restriction what government has applied to all drivers to avoid accidents and its my personal request that if any of the drivers are caught texting or talking on phone while driving please take a strict decision against them.
All the best for making more great decision.

Regards.

Nice action,
I think Penalty of $2,750 for playing with innocent people is not enough. DOT must take more strict action against drivers texting while driving as accident while texting is been increasing day by day.
Regards.

I am a commercial driver and I never use my phone while driving. But I have seen lots of motorist using cell phones without hands free devices or texting and yet they are still allowed to continue these practices.

it's great to know that the government is giving enough attention for the welfare of truck drivers as they set wheels on the track. Truck drivers,on the other hand, should also cooperate and be responsible with policies so as to maintain safety for everyone.

http://www.truckrentals.net

In England , police penalize drivers using phones for 1000 Pounds. Each.
Here , 100 is nothing . Hundreds of drivers using phone on passenger cars and police stopped to fine them

The Federal Communications Commision (FCC) in the United States passed regulations requiring that 95% of all cell phones in use in the USA be 911 locatable by December 31, 2005. To be 911 locatable, the phone must have some form of GPS... active.

If there is an active GPS in every cell phone, then it can be determined if that phone is moving. If the phone is moving over say, 15 mph and there is no bluetooth or hands free detected, lock it up.

The satellite communication device in my semi locks up when the vehicle is moving 5mph. I don't text on my phone, it's a phone. I put on my bluetooth headset so I can see clearly and roll down the road, watching all the kids playing Farmville on their IPhones.

Idiocy and I can't wait until some personal injury lawyer decides to add in the cell phone company as a party of interest. They have the money to make a lawyer's dreams come true. But this legislation is extremely one-sided.

Mr. LaHood comes from Peoria, IL. Just down the road in Champaign, a 19 year old admitted to the judge he was texting when he ran down an 84 year old man and killed him. He got fined. Nearly 90% of Teen Drivers Engage in Distracted Driving, Say AAA & Seventeen Magazine survey from August.

How can the Secretary feel good about this? He missed a huge segment of the population that violates his mandate daily. I see from the cab of my truck how dangerous other drivers are. Every day. I want them ALL to stop it. And if they have no hands free phone, make that inoperable too.

May these regulations help in Road Safety and decrease in accidents. Texting while driving trucks or any other commercial vehicles is unsafe.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe

  • E-mail updates
    E-mail updates
  • RSS feed
    RSS feed
Add to Technorati Favorites