Last week we announced the Obama Administration's high-speed and inter-city passenger rail grants. The media has gone through the awards and regional rail plans for using those awards productively, and I am pleased by the enthusiastic and positive response from all over the U.S.
America has embraced high-speed rail.
Over the past few days, I’ve heard transportation experts around the country collectively exhaling after waiting nearly a year to see how we evaluated the various proposals. State leaders are excited about what this means for their economic future. And the public is thrilled to see the U.S. move full speed ahead toward a 21st century transportation infrastructure that will rival systems in Europe and Asia.
"YES," they seemed to all affirm as they finally stopped holding their breath. "It's HERE."
"Yes," said Eugene Conti, head of North Carolina's Department of Transportation and Petra Todorovich, director of America 2050. Said Conti:
"This historic day is the culmination of more than a decade of work by state DOTs across the country. States stand ready to plan, build, and deliver. These projects represent the building blocks of our national intercity rail system. They will create good jobs and reinvigorate domestic manufacturing in the U.S."
"Yes," said Governors Arnold Schwarzenegger of California and Jay Nixon of Missouri and Jim Doyle of Wisconsin and governors of other states that had submitted plans demonstrating substantial planning and state financial support. "You really can't underestimate how extraordinary this moment is," said Nixon. "This is a transformative step."
"Yes," said state Reps. Terri Austin of Indiana and Connie Pillich of Ohio and other legislators of those states who had bravely committed themselves to voting in favor of a new day for passenger rail in this country. Rep. Pillich focused on economic development: “Sharonville will see fantastic growth as the first stop in the Cincinnati area. It will become the gateway to Cincinnati.”
"Yes," said downtown-to-downtown business travelers whose in-transit time can be spent more productively in the seat of a train than behind the wheel of a car. "You can’t just look at the time alone," said Ken Prendergast of All Aboard Ohio, "because people are more relaxed and can be more productive on a train.”
"Yes," said Phineas Baxterall of US PIRG and Howard Learner of the Environmental Law and Policy Center and other environmental advocates who want to see anticipated growth in automobile carbon emissions curbed by keeping cars off the road. As the editorial board at the San Francisco Chronicle put it:
"A high-speed rail system for a growing state with already overstressed transportation systems and a commitment to reduce the carbon emissions that are threatening the health of the planet for our children and grandchildren certainly qualifies as a sound long-term investment."
"Yes," said entrepreneurs like Doc Dockery of Lakeland, Florida, who see opportunities for economic development around increasingly active downtown stations and along proposed new corridors. "This is a great day," said the 76-year old businessman who has championed rail efforts in Florida for many years.
"Yes," said the Dallas Morning News--even though Texas was awarded a relatively small grant.
But there was one surprisingly ill-informed “No.”
I was disappointed to see the Washington Post’s editorial yesterday, which pointed to a low-value project that did NOT receive ANY funding! And also to a project they like--the Northeast Corridor--that they claim was given short-shrift.