« To the class of 2010: Our differences matter; Finding common ground matters more | Main | With Future of Aviation Advisory Committee, industry charts its own flight path »

May 24, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e551eea4f588340133ee534c46970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 2010's Click It Or Ticket campaign
has one goal: to save lives
:

Comments

Mr Secretary,

You mention 'Click It or Ticket' and instantly there are comments that the gov't should not be a nanny. You need a national information campaign to inform all drivers and passengers that the use of seat belts helps to prevent crashes as well as protecting during and after crashes.
An unbelted driver can be moved from behind the wheel and away from the pedals if the vehicle is set into a clockwise spin - even if thru no fault of the driver. Unbelted passengers can interfere with the driver even when the driver is belted.
Use of seat belts is NOT a personal choice issue and the whole world has to be informed of that fact. There are too many people who see 'personal choice' in everything when in some instances it is an issue of being a potential danger to those around them. Let's get the message out.

Seat belts are one of the best safety devices we have and should always be used. The Click it or Ticket Campaign will get attention and that is what is necessary for greater use of seatbelts. Our highway safety programs are better than what many nations now have. In Canada mohre people are killed on the roads but fewer people use the seatbelts there and many like to drink and drive. Seatbelts do save lives. Best wishes, Michael E. Bailey.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't car safety specifciations in the USA require manufacturers to provide protection for dirvers and passenegers not wearing a seatbelt? If so, this sends out the wrong message, and those requirements should be abolished.

I have been searching for PROOF for my school paper that seat belts save lives. There isn't any. thousands of posts and articles spewing the same things. like this one saying 38 people a day died because they werent wearing a seat belt. Where is the truth in the statement it needs to be qualified with something. The absence of a seat belt can not kill you. The accident can. I need proof of all this rederick. The opponents of the seatbelt laws have plenty of evidence to show there is no correlation between seat belt use and life saving. Somebody PRINT SOMETHING useful.

As traffic tickets are civil infractions, we can't defend against these tickets.

I had a ticket with a gray seat belt with a gray shirt on. Went to traffic court and lost.

The Primary Enforcement law of Seat Belts is the most assassinated pieces of law that has been pushed by the Feds in 20 years if not longer.

Bottom line, the cities have turned this into a revenue operation and even with three witnesses that I had a seat belt on, I still lost.

I know in some cities, seat belt violations are secondary offenses,,,meaning they have to stop you for some other violation before you get a ticket for no seat belt.

I think it needs to be the same law nation-wide.

That's great policy. safety first.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe

  • E-mail updates
    E-mail updates
  • RSS feed
    RSS feed
Add to Technorati Favorites