« DOT and Women's Transportation Seminar partnering to seize, create opportunities | Main | To the class of 2010: Our differences matter; Finding common ground matters more »

May 21, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e551eea4f5883401348155e091970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Nation, DOT take to the streets--with helmets on
for National Bike to Work Day
:

Comments

Why the insistence on helmets? They decrease ridership and give drivers a false sense of 'oh I can't hurt this rider'. I use helmets sometimes, especially on longer trips, but around town they aren't fully necessary.

Thanks for your support Ray!!! We need to completely change the way we think about transportation. Bicycles need to move from aliens on planet-car, and becoming full citizens of planet-transportation. Bikers need support. And then need to stop being punished when they struggle to go down roads not designed for them - fined by laws that were not implemented for them. When a biker gets hit by a car, we need to stop asking why the biker intentionally hurt himself by hitting the car - and start asking how poorly designed roads and laws cause these accidents. We need bike infrastructure and bike laws (just like we have boat infrastructure and boat laws, airplane infrastructure and airplane laws). Bikes save transportation dollars. They protect the environment. They may their human riders healthier, fight obesity, and bring down health costs. Bikes are (a part of ) the solution.

G'day America,

as an Australian commuter cyclist of 27yrs, road construction engineer and currently a cycling facility engineer, I'm really glad to see the US Administration's change in attitude since the disastrous Bush era (or was that "error":-) Please keep the change momentum going for all the many benefits that cycling / walking / PT provide.

Being a cheeky Aussie, I've got to ask though, the name of your blog, "Fast Lane". Shouldn't that be "Fat Lane". After all, excessive car use has lead to many Americans and Aussies become far fatter than they would have if car use wasn't so dominant. Also of course car lanes are far fatter (wider) than skinny bike lanes.

Also is "Fast Lane" what you really want to promote these days? The expectation of "fast" car travel has lead to excessive car use and road rage (I'm terrible for road rage when I drive I must admit. I can't stand all that driver stupidity - not concentrating, not obeying road rules, driving slow in the fast lane etc.) It also implies that car travel is the fastest travel which of course is not always the case especially when you take into account the time consumed in car ownership like earning the money to pay for the car, fuel, maintenance, the garage & taxes for larger roads. Even in the 80's I could ride through Sydney faster by bike up to 18km than I could drive it because of the congestion. Perhaps a name change to a more suitable message is appropriate?

Anyway, keep up the travel behaviour change - it'll help lead many ignorant people everywhere out of the car dominated, LA freeway city model that has been such a failure in public policy.

We need to make much greater use of walking, bicycling, and transit. Bike to Work Day is a step in the right direction, but as the situation now going on in the Gulf of Mexico shows andas rush hour in too many of our large cities show much more needs to be done. Walking, bycicling and transit need to be integrated more closely together and different modes of transit--buses, light rail, commuter rail--more integrated. This will be the key to making the Clean Air Act work. Southern California, especially Orange County,uses buses, light rail, and commuter rail that can all carry bicycles. And we have a large number of bike lanes, paths and trails that link both ends of the county. Amtrak California also can carry bicycles. And so we are moving along with an integrated transportation system for the 21st Century. The old 20th Century idea of one driver per car and covering every open space with asphalt is something that needs to be left back in the 20th Century together with the dirty fuels used o power gasoline and diesel engines. Best wishes, Michael E. Bailey.

Hey, congratulations on this project! I'm based in Madrid and while there are cities in Spain which even have public car-rental systems (like Barcelona), in Madrid there are hardly any designated roads for bicycle riders and even though my job is quite close it's impossible to reach by bike. Anyway, keep up the work and good luck :)

Roy Kienitz is a transportation innovator and icon. We in Maryland are quite impressed that Roy is now at USDOT.

Great post - can DOT sponsor a nationwide bike sharing system like we have in DC? That would be amazing.

The FTA's new policy for boosting federal bike-ped spending sets radius surrounding a transit station in which bike infrastructure projects would be eligible for aid at three miles.

A three miles radius from transit stations would cover a good chunk of New Jersey too, at least where a vast majority of the people live. Still I think it's important to concentrate on that last 1/4 mile around stations since that is naturally where the most bicycle and pedestrian use will happen as people access stations.

Following up. My ride to BTWD was great. My ride home involved
* Two pedestrian crazy-ivans - where pedestrians on an active bike path made dramatic and erratic turns
* Two cars running red lights, one at the pedestrian crossing on the Natl Mall near the WWII memorial
* And one girl pedestrian obliviously listening to her ipod who ignored a red do not walk light and walked right in front of a car missing her by inches

We have a residential transportation system based on cars. This has to change. The solution is not to shoe horn bikes into planet-car. The solution is real bike lanes. For example, create a bike "parkway" down the national mall using the existing paths. Nothing new would have to be built. But mark it well and provide notice that during rush how, bikes have the priority and will be flying. Tourists and others, while welcome, should probably take there pictures not on the bike parkway. This would make it safer for bikes. It would make it safer for pedestrians. And heck, it would make it safer for cars bc the bikes would migrate to the safe routes and out of traffic.

light rail, and commuter rail that can all carry bicycles. And we have a large number of bike lanes, paths and trails that link both ends of the county. Amtrak California also can carry bicycles. And so we are moving along with an integrated transportation system for the 21st Century. The old 20th Century idea of one driver per car and covering every open space with asphalt is something that needs to be left back in the 20th Century together with the dirty fuels used o power gasoline and diesel engines. Best wishes, Michael E. Bailey.

We have a residential transportation system based on cars. This has to change. The solution is not to shoe horn bikes into planet-car. The solution is real bike lanes. For example, create a bike "parkway" down the national mall using the existing paths.

I would love to see my city invest more in bicycle-pedestrian projects. I see bicyclists trying to ride on busy streets in the morning and not only is it dangerous for them, but it jams up traffic, because cars have to go around them.

Biking is a blast and I would really like to see bike paths installed on the roads around West Allis, Wisconsin. Its a great way to stay in shape, save money on gas and just be more green. Unfortunately I find myself stuck to scenic bike paths or sidewalks, because of the lack of proper bike paths.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe

  • E-mail updates
    E-mail updates
  • RSS feed
    RSS feed
Add to Technorati Favorites