« Guest blogger: Deputy Secretary John Porcari Summertime means construction, jobs for Ohioans | Main | High-speed rail to connect Madison and Milwaukee, but Watertown's access may be the real story »

July 29, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e551eea4f588340133f2ac1b6a970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Biennial of the Americas seeks answers
to tough energy, climate challenges
:

Comments

Great work you are doing, Mr. LaHood. We are in the process of getting approval for a Ciclovia here in Santa Monica on October 10th. Come and ride/walk/play with us!

Natural gas motor fuels may not be "the" silver bullet, but substituting natural gas for liquid petroleum-based motor fuels TODAY is as good a deal as the American consumer will find given the state of technology, known domestic energy reserves and environmental constraints. Natural gas vehicles, if mass produced, and natural gas motor fuels, are affordable, safe, available, scalable, convenient, clean and reduce carbon emissions by 20% to 30%; better than grid plug-in HEVs and food grain biofuels currently in vogue. Perhaps most importantly these gaseous motor fuels will prepare consumers for intrduction of even more sustainable motor fuels and technologies, like hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles, TOMMORROW. Enact policy that will give Americans the power to choose their motor fuels and vehicles wisely, with full disclosure of fact-based performance metrics (based on policy goals) at the point of sale.

Whilst I realize that a concerted effort must be made to reduce the effects of climate change, I have concerns as to how the funding of new infrastructure to accommodate new transportation options will be made. Will this burden be essentially passed to vehicle owners to fund such schemes?

I'd love to see tax incentives for those who buy cars that get over 35 mpg and tax penalties for those that which get less. Maybe you get or pay $200 for each mpg off of the 35 mpg "norm." So, a 30 mpg car pays an extra $1000 in taxes. Whereas a 40 mpg gets a $1000 tax incentive. A 10 mpg Hummer would pay an extra $5000 in taxes. A 50 mpg Prius would get a $3000 incentive.

Money talks.

I like the fact that the Obama administration is taking steps and moving forward on trying to make this country less reliant on foreign oil. It’s nice to see we finally have an administration that is listening to the people that elected them. I like the idea of improving and building more sidewalks and bicycle paths. I love to ride my mountain bike. A high-speed rail system is long overdue. But one thing that has me a little disappointed with your post is, 35.5 mpg by 2016. I honestly believe that the technology is already available to push 45 to 50 mpg. To me 35.5 mpg is a short coming. After we the tax payer have bailed out the auto industry again, I believe there should be more pressure put on them. Pressure to not only payback the money they received, but build a highly efficient vehicle. I think it’s the least they could do for the people that seem to have to continuously bail them out, “The American Tax Payer”. My 2 cents.

Its great that we can for the first time look at both bicycling and walking as legitimate forms of transportation and work to make both easier and safer. And also good news that transit is being seen for what it is as a critical factor in cutting air pollution. These are all important positive changes. Our South Orange County Metrolink terminal in San Juan Capistrano is also going to do a bicycle renting program this year. If it goes well, more Orange County stations will do it next year. Best wishes, Michael E. Bailey.

Floods, droughts, pollution and climate change have created even more problems. It is important that China play an increasingly prominent role on climate change. right??

Very inspiring, Mr. Lahood! Thank you. We have a 10 point plan for action #2: Treating biking and walking as valid and valued elements of our transportation network. We're working to make bicycling a part of Hawaii's Clean Energy Future. Find out more at this link: http://www.pathhawaii.org/?page_id=74

Thank you for your inspiring leadership!

I have concerns as to how the funding of new infrastructure to accommodate new transportation options will be made. Will this burden be essentially passed to vehicle owners to fund such schemes?

I'm convinced that big comfortable Bus and Bicycle maybe the good method to reduce the energy waste.

A high-speed rail system is long overdue. But one thing that has me a little disappointed with your post is, 35.5 mpg by 2016. I honestly believe that the technology is already available to push 45 to 50 mpg. To me 35.5 mpg is a short coming.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe

  • E-mail updates
    E-mail updates
  • RSS feed
    RSS feed
Add to Technorati Favorites