« At the National Truck Driving Championships, the Super Bowl of Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety, Truckers go for the gold | Main | Bloomington-Normal transit facilities keep economy, people moving »

August 06, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e551eea4f588340133f2e4224c970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Pedestrian safety issue hits close to home:

Comments

Yikes, that is awful news. I am growing increasingly convinced that smartphones may be the culprit in lot and lots of accidents. Not sure what to do about it but please keep looking into it. THanks for your work and all the info. Siena

M Street is 6 lanes of high-volume, fast-moving construction, industrial, and commuter traffic separating the DOT headquarters building from the Navy Yard metro station and 99.9% of all restaurants and shops in the vicinity. Street blocks are long, and crosswalks are few and far between. The wait for pedestrians to get a signal to cross is long, and the time they have to cross when they get a signal is very short. Harried drivers sometimes turn rapidly in front of pedestrians in crosswalks while pedestrians have the cross signal but drivers also have green. Nearly all vehicles on M street are moving much too fast to slow and stop in time if/when a pedestrian does inadvertently step in front of them. It's a simple mobility-benefit/safety-cost tradeoff, which appears to me much too heavily biased towards mobility and against safety. Some potential mitigation strategies: (1) reduce speed limit on M St; (2) prevent turns on to or off of M St while a pedestrian crosswalk signal is on; (3) provide pedestrian crosswalks and/or tunnels across M St to separate pedestrian and vehicle traffic; (4) provide immediate pedestrian cross signals when the request button is pressed; (5) enforce laws on the books for both drivers and pedestrians; (6) accelerate deployment of technologies to allow all vehicle drivers, pedestrians, and bicyclists to detect imminent collision threats and respond accordingly, e.g., using otherwise distracting electronic devices such as smart phones to do the sensing and warning applications automatically.

I read through many various ideas for solving the safety issues. It seems that almost all ideas involves a lot of times, costs, and resources. Being a simple person, lets look this way - whenever an accident between a pedestrian and a vehicle happens, who get hurt the most? Obviously, the pedestrian - no matter whose fault is it. I think that no matter how hard we try to improve the pedestrain safety, the pedistrains always end up being victims. Hence, the pedistrains need to be more cautious -

- stop texting
- look both sides of street
- if you see a car coming and you aren't sure, stay put.
- if you see a car waiting to move and you aren't sure, stay put.
- IMPORTANT TIP - if a car is waiting at light or parking with a driver inside, make sure to get eye contacts and gesture to ask if you can walk on. WAIT WAIT for the driver to respond with a gesture that you can walk on. Again, if you aren't sure or the driver doesn't respond, stay put!

I think that these safety tips are a good way to protect yourself, and they involves no additional resource.

I'm surprised that the DOT's are still finding themselves so interested in Public Relations instead of focusing directly on their businesses

If you would like your community livability initiative to succeed, then more attention must be paid to pedestrian safety, especially with the design and location.
it is actually more cost effective. After all, safety is always DOT's top priority, right?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe

  • E-mail updates
    E-mail updates
  • RSS feed
    RSS feed
Add to Technorati Favorites