« FTA grant for Wayne Junction station will connect commuters, restore historic intermodal transit facility | Main | On Amtrak's 40th, celebrating a historic past and anticipating a bright future »

May 02, 2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e551eea4f58834015432122908970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference NHTSA, AAA join together for National Bike Safety Month
with new "Roll Model" campaign
:

Comments

I'm loathe to listen to AAA's stance on such issues, when their local mid-atlantic chapter lobbies to get rid of all transportation trust fund spending on bike, pedestrian, and even transit facilities.

National Summer Transportation Institute (NSTI) Summer Camp!

NSTI explores all modes of transportation and how we can create communities of the future that are safe and people oriented. Check out www.uvm.edu/trc/nsti and apply today.

trailsforyouth.org is releasing a new video entitled: "listen,learn, and lead, bicycle and pedestrian advice for adults" This short bicycle video gives sound advice (in english and spanish) on leading by example

As part of the U.N. decade of actions, folks who share the video online on May 11 will be eligible to win some great prizes while spreading the word of traffic safety!!

More to follow on May 11!!!

Seriously do you guys (NHTSA and AAA) tell truckers how drive without consulting truckers? Then why are you doing this with bicyclists? Why is the League of American Bicyclists not involved? Why are you using signage that has not been adopted into the MUTCD?

I urge you to be a "Roll Model" and consult with organizations that are truly out to improve safety for a mode of travel you are talking about rather then make up stuff as you go.

Roll Model is an interesting campaign that wont end this month but carry on through the years. to all adult bikers... let set a good example for the children and we shall all enjoy this spring and summer safely. all motorist must respect each other. I support roll model for safety and u?

I find it interesting that this campaign is brought to us by a consortium that includes an auto-centric group but doesn't include The League of American Bicyclists.

Elderly drivers are one of the greatest causes of cyclist deaths, and yet the AAA regularly lobbies hard against any mandatory retesting at decade marks for drivers who in many cases are extremely dangerous. If the AAA wishes to bring greater bike safety, simply reducing its lobbying budget in this area would go a long way.

Why the US DoT would take bike safety advice from the AAA and NHTSA, I have no idea. They're not exactly familiar with biking, or supportive of it.

It grieves me when the "first" thing you're told is to wear a helmet.
Helmets are good if you have an accident -- and you hit your head.
The FIRST parts of safety should be about preventing the accidents.

How about the NHTSA and AAA being proper "roll models" by:
1.) Not using a road sign that is not found in the MUTCD. In fact, your sign shows a car buzzing a cyclist. Get a clue. How about using the "Bicycles may use full lane" sign? By the way, three feet of clearance when passing is the minimum for low speed roads; add a foot for every 10 mph over 25 mph.
2.) Helmets are often worse than useless in a wreck involving a car or a high-speed cyclist because of target and torsional effects. They are designed for the sort of impact that happens when a novice simply falls over at low speed. There is also research that suggests motorists give unhelmeted cyclists more room when passing. Drop the helmet plug. Now, if you want to talk about how many motorist lives could be saved by mandatory helmet use in cars...
3.) Most long-term cyclists ride all year round. Rain, snow, sleet, wind, ice or fog we're out there moving along without damaging our economy or environment with imported oil. Also, our numbers are growing faster than any other form of transportation. Drop the whole seasonal plaything attitude.

Where, exactly, is the data that actually shows that riding a bicycle makes you more prone to Traumatic Brain Injury than, say, riding a bike?

Hey, AAA -- stop trying to make people thinking biking is more dangerous than driving!

NHTSA and AAA, why didnt you actually talk with cyclists about how to promote bicycling during Bike month?

It is Bike Month, not motorists-tell-bicyclists-what-to-do-month.

And as long as you are grandstanding about safety standards why are you highlight a picture of a sign that is not accepted by the manual of uniform traffic control devices? (http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/htm/2003/part9/part9b.htm)

Start by talking LAB and using correct signage...thats how you might promote cycling....since it is BIKE MONTH.

It seems unfortunate that the emphasis is on helmets and lecturing cyclists about the rules of the road. While cyclists should certainly follow the law, helmets won't prevent most injuries -- especially those from collisions with cars -- and their effectiveness in preventing head injuries is hotly debated. Statistically, helmet use in cars and while using stairs would prevent more head injuries than use by cyclists will.

I think it is important to remind folks that in most or all states bicycles are considered vehicles and have a legal right to use the road, which both (1) prohibits them from riding on sidewalks, and (2) includes taking up an entire lane when need be. Many motorists don't realize all of the debris that gathers near the side of the road that can be dangerous from cyclists to ride through.

I would also stress the benefits of cycling for: (1) reducing the number of cars on the road, (2) lowering the amount of pollution from cars, (3) creating a healthier nation and helping to fight childhood obesity. Bike safety is more than helmets -- it is realizing that cyclists are human beings who are doing something that is mostly positive, and who we (all drivers) have a duty not to harm.

While I generally ride my bicycle to the right WHEN SAFE, there are times that it's safer to take the lane, rather than ride far right. Examples of when it's safer to take the lane include, but aren't limited to, substandard width lanes that are too narrow to share with a motor vehicle, avoid potential danger of parked car doors opening, when travelling speed of traffic, and some areas where righthand turns are authorized. Two bicyclists (Jack Yates and Nathan Kapolanski) were respectively killed and put into a coma in Baltimore City by right turning motor vehicles . Both tragic crashes that occurred on downhills could have been prevented had Jack Yates used the travel lane instead of the parking lane and Nathan used the travel lane instead of the bikelane.
In summary bicyclists should only be instructed to keep right (or use a bikelane) when it's safe to do so. The bicyclist has the best view of when it's safe to keep right. Signs telling motorist that bicyclists must share the road by always keeping far right gives the wrong message.

my kid actually learned his lesson about wearing a helmet in a strange way.
when he was younger he pulled on a bookshelf that gave him a nasty head injury (blood, hospital, er ~ all the good stuff) needless to say i bought furniture fasteners for just about everything in my home. i thought he was too young to remember, but whenever he goes biking, he NEVER leaves the house without a helmet... i guess its better that he learned his lesson without falling into the bike accident statistic (45,000 head injuries daily :( ...)
anyways thanks for posting and sharing :D

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe

  • E-mail updates
    E-mail updates
  • RSS feed
    RSS feed
Add to Technorati Favorites