« In California, momentum building for High-Speed Rail | Main | 2013 Budget reflects central role of transportation in the lives of Americans, in the vitality of our nation's economy »

February 13, 2012

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e551eea4f58834016761d1c1c2970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Pipeline safety grant opportunities in your community:

Comments

I am completely lost on this pipeline controversay. Why does it take sooooo long or a pipeline to be approved?

Now I find out we have public contributor groups being paid to comment and submit reports. First is would take a public group a long time to acquire data, have meeting, then write a report. Then someone someplace has to have meetings and read all these various reports.

Tell me there is no politics in these reports. Our court system randomly chooses people to sit on juries. Perhaps on these types of subject we should bring a group of randomly selected people and allow the companies and their opponents two weeks of testimony before the public committees say yes or no. Then we would have at least the local public feedback. Much faster, cleaner, and more accurate.

We need to recognize that people with opinions rarely change their minds based on the other sides facts or perceived facts and explanations. We keep believing the more I yell at the top of my lungs that someone is really listenting.

When it comes to pipelines the yelling produces delays or inaction within the government. We put up obstacles to our energy program and wonder why after 40 years we still have no energy solution.

Lladro

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe

  • E-mail updates
    E-mail updates
  • RSS feed
    RSS feed
Add to Technorati Favorites